Saturday, May 28, 2011

Is the man-child President's request for Republican ideas on health care reform sincere

Is the man-child President's request for Republican ideas on health care reform sincere?
I don't think so.
Politics - 10 Answers
   

Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Its token BS propaganda for the masses.
2 :
Why doesn't your opinion surprise me?
3 :
Nothing this man says is to be believed. He is losing his radical arguments so he is being dishonest again in attempt to fool voters. It won't happen.
4 :
Sort of like LBJ saying I just want to share your pain on our hearing 50+ thousand American troops being killed in his war.
5 :
Yes, unlike some people - Obama DOES care about America's future. The Republicans care about campaign donations from big insurance. Our current system is not sustainable. We need health insurance reform.
6 :
You're aware, I'm SURE, that there were hundreds of republican amendments included in the Senate Bill, right? Of course you are.
7 :
Oh that's real mature... " we don't think he's sincere, so we're not going to work with them "..... Why don't Republicans in Congress just quit already....?...they are getting paid to do nothing ! In Congress...working with your opposition is VERY hard at times.....especially if you are the minority party.....BUT THAT IS THE F'n JOB THEY TOOK !...THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IS EXPECTED OF THEM ! Nobody expects Dems and Reps to agree on most things....but they are expected to work together so that we have a functional government. This isn't a F'n GAME ! It's painfully obvious that Republican have no ideas, or they have no ideas that they care to wager their political futures on..... (with the exception of "tort reform")...so how about another idea other than that ?
8 :
It always has been sincere. Since the republicans vote in a block and allow no free thinking among their members they refuse to discuss any ideas unless the ideas are their own. Take a good look at them. It is so obvious they refuse to compromise on anything.
9 :
Was Bush's claim that the mission was accomplished sincere?
10 :
who is the man- child?





Read more discussions :

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

can a nannie or caregiver deliver a child in ontario for free from her ontario health card to any hospital

can a nannie or caregiver deliver a child in ontario for free from her ontario health card to any hospital?
PREGNANT NANNIES OR CAREGIVER CAN BE PREGNANT IN ONTARIO AND DELIVER FOR FREE FROM ONTARIO HEALTH CARD AND FROM ANY HOSPITAL?
Toronto - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
If you have an OHIP card that is not expired then you are covered under OHIP so therefore labour and delivery services at a hospital would be covered.





Read more discussions :

Friday, May 20, 2011

Do I have the legal right to remove my child from a mental Health Facility

Do I have the legal right to remove my child from a mental Health Facility?
My 15 yr. old was voluntarily admitted to a treatment center for depression...they said about 4 to 7 days.....can I now take her out even if they say she needs to stay longer? (It has been 7 days)
Mental Health - 9 Answers
 


 Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
OF COURSE IT IS YOUR CHILD
2 :
I think another question lies in this question. Your 15 yr old is depressed and you realize that. Why would you want to rush her out of treatment? She is receiving treatment and it takes longer than this amount of time to address her depression. Why not stand back and allow her to get the help that she needs, for her own sake? She may need a prescription to help her stay focused. If so, the doctors may be monitoring how the prescription is working for her. IF she attempted suicide you, certainly, want to realize why. Leaving her with the doctors for a while may allow your daughter the time she needs to realize how precious her life is. Please, don't rush this. Allow your daughter time to adjust.Allow her to speak to professionals about her feelings. You could rush her exit, but, it would defeat the purpose.
3 :
I don't know if you legally can or not, but know this; nowadays, the government takes full control of your child, which is totally wicked.
4 :
it is your child, so you do have the legal right, unless the court forced you, but since you said you did it, you may withdraw your child, though I highly encourage you not to
5 :
I can only answer based on UK law. Yes you can remove her - but it would be best if done through negotiation with her Responsible Medical Officer (RMO - the consultant Psychiatrist). It is unusual to admit someone of such age without ther being real concern for her safety. Bear in mind that as well as mental health law, she is also subject to the Children's Act. The RMO and Social Services would have to have extreme concerns for her safety or the safety of others to use the law to prevent you from removing her. They may want to stress to you that you will assume sole responsibility for her safety after discharge. Try to reach a compromise. Also, ask what services could be used as an alternative to in-patient care. Edit: just want to add - what they CAN NOT do is use a 'threat' of detention, i.e. tell you that IF you try to remove her, they will then detain her. This is in contravention of Mental Health Law - as it informally compels you to do what they want, and yet doesn't afford you the rights of formal detention.
6 :
I voluntarily admitted myself to a child/adolescent psychiatric hospital in WI when I was 16 (I'm now 17), and I remember my parents signing something giving up that right. There was some documentation signed that said something about court and the court deciding if the child stays if the parents want to remove her. It likely depends on where you live. But please, don't take her out if she's not ready to go. I wasn't ready to leave, and my insurance ran out. At over a grand a day, we couldn't afford it. Hospitalization helped, but it would have helped much more had I been allowed to stay. (I got discharged at the discretion of my docotors, who thought I was ready). Make this decision in your daughter's best interest. Please. I'm begging you for her.
7 :
Yes, you can remove your child. It's what known as "against medical advice" (commonly referred to AMA). A couple things to keep in mind though... One thing you should know is that if you do remove her AMA, your insurance company will not likely cover the expenses of her inpatient stay for the time she was there. Insurance companies usually only pay for inpatient stays where the child was discharged according to doctor's orders. I believe one day of inpatient treatment is about $1,000, so if she's been there a week, that would be $7,000 (approximately) that you would have to be paying out of pocket for her inpatient stay. One more thing to know...when they said 4-7 days originally, that was the estimated time they thought she would be there based on the symptoms she was presenting with at that time. Circumstances change...for example, if they put her on medication while she was there and she has not responded well to it or was on a medication and then had to switch her to another one, then they have to observe her for a couple days to see how she will react to the medication. They are not keeping her there any extra time that she doesn't need to be there for...if they're keeping her longer than was originally anticipated, then it's for a reason. If you have any questions, feel free to call her doctor, therapist, or the nursing staff at her facility. They will more than likely be happy to answer any questions you might have about your daughter's treatment. They appreciate when parents are involved in their child's care. Good luck and hope this helps.
8 :
Yes, if the treatment center fights it you can go in front of the judge and petition him or her for a release.
9 :
I'm a nursing supervisor of an adolescent unit. I have worked in MO and IL and yes, you do have the legal right to remove your child,...in most cases. Are you her actual legal guardian? Are you the one who signed her in to the facility? If you answered yes, then you may request her discharge. Some places have a "Five Day Notice" that you can give notice that within 5 days, you wish her discharge from the hospital. Communicate with the nurses and psychiatrists and therapists. Explain your concerns, get answers, find out what you can do to help your daughter in the best way. A dr. may also discharge "AMA" or Against Medical Advice which means that she is not an immediate threat of self/other harm, but still needs intensive psychiatric care. Oftentimes, insurance will not cover if AMA is processed. If you are not her legal guardian, then you do not have the right to remove her. If she is a threat of harm to herself or others, the psychiatrist may take temporary custody for her safety. Some things to think about. You placed your child in a facility to recieve help. You entrusted them to care for and treat your child. You want the best for your child. The facility needs your full cooperation to best assist her. Four to seven days is a very short stay; compared to an entire lifetime, it is but a minute. A few weeks away in a hospital is nothing compared to a lifetime away from a loved one who has suicided. Hospitalization is meant for stabilization from a threat to harm oneself or others. The physician is most likely evaluating her mental status, her ability to function adequately, how well she responds to medication(s). It is also necessary to set up discharge criteria as to where she will followup when she goes home... ie the psychiatrist, a psychologist, a counselor or therapist, outpatient, support group, etc. All of these things take time and most of all, family support. I always tell families at the facility where I work that the USUAL length of stay is 7 to 10 days, but it could be shorter or longer than this depending on the individual. It is different for everyone. My main concern is for the reason you wish for her to be discharged when the facility team recommends a longer stay and what is your goal for your daughter? Are you homesick for her to be home? Are you unhappy with the care or the facility? Do you feel she is completely healed now? Whatever the reason, the main focus is on your daughter and what is best for her and her safety. You brought her to the hospital for a reason... If you are homesick for her, that is normal and okay. But remember, she won't be there forever and it is very temporary of a stay. A few more days may be what she needs to better stabilize. If you are unhappy with the care or the facility, speak to the supervisor of your concerns. If you feel she is completely healed right now, she has you fooled. Depression is a lengthy illness and takes much time and energy and most of all support to heal. I hope you find this helpful. Blessings to you and your daughter.






Read more discussions :

Monday, May 16, 2011

The minor child of the Biological father is covered in Michigan under his step dads health Insurance now if

The minor child of the Biological father is covered in Michigan under his step dads health Insurance now if?
he comes down to vacation with his biological father in Florida he is still covered, the father would just need a copy of the health insurance card Correct ?
Family - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
It would help. I would also send a letter giving the biological father permission to seek emergency treatment in case the biological father doesn't have that right.
2 :
Some medical insurance companies have blanket coverage across the U.S., Most don't, Most Insurance Companies place restrictions on what they will cover outside your home area, and where you can take someone in an emergency, even a list of doctors that are allowed to treat the patient. If you don't follow their guide lines, they don't pay for health care. You need to call your insurance company and find out what their regulations consist of for receiving care outside your home area.
3 :
It shouldn't matter to what state the minor child travels to. He will still be covered by the health insurance. Yes, the father should have a copy of the insurance card, but even without it he would be covered. It would just make the process go so much easier if a visit had to be made to a doctor or medical facility with the card, of course. A lot of health insurance companies these days do have restrictions about which doctors you can go to, etc., but if it's an emergency it will be covered. You might want to call the health insurance company and question them about the details.
4 :
I think...25...but that's FL law.





Read more discussions :

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Why is Bush taking money away from child health care

Why is Bush taking money away from child health care ?

Politics - 17 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
because he hates children. Why are the Liberals ignoring the details of the bill? Politicians vote for bad bills because of the rhetoric that goes into headlines, and the crap on the Internet. There will never be another politician who will cut any government program ever again. Get out your checkbook! The US Comptroller warned us about the cost of government and how it will lead to a serious recession, but the Liberals in this country have ignored it (Republicans will lose seats in their districts because they spent too much, but what happens next? We replace them with a Liberal? How is that change?)
2 :
He's not. Nice spin, there, silly liberal.
3 :
He is not providing the CHIP propgram with extra funding because he has to pay for the death of children in IRAQ
4 :
He IS? Cite a source please?
5 :
to prove he still has the power to stand up the Democrats...it's a spitting contest really.
6 :
There is plenty of money available for child health care. He isn't taking money away, he is preventing frivolous money from going in and preventing socialized medicine.
7 :
He isn't. He didn't like the terms of that bill, and he had told the Congress that he would veto it if they didn't change it. They didn't change it, and he vetoed it. This morning he said he will help them find more money for it if they are willing to sit down and work with him about it. I hope they do, but the ball is in their court, not President Bush's.
8 :
simple: the only people he hates more than children are the poor. so denying poor children health care? its a win/win situation. besides, ANYTHING is acceptable, just so long as we don't have a program that is anything like the EVIL socialism. wouldn't want that, now would we?
9 :
Bush is not taking money away, he just doesn't want the law to be expanded to cover "children" up to the age of 27 and families with income 3 times the poverty level. All Congress has to do to continue giving healthcare to deserving children and children in need is to vote to continue the current law. Bush has said he will support that.
10 :
The way he see's it, they're not his kids.
11 :
He's not.Too much emotion and not enough facts= liberal logic.
12 :
HE'S KILLING ALL THE KIDS!!! HE'S A MONSTER WITH THREE HEADS!!!!
13 :
It would take money away from the Iraq war funds. Ask him to give 7 billion to Blackwater or Halliburton, no problem. But give 7 billion for child health care? no way
14 :
because he raether spend money getting american soldiers killed than helpin kids
15 :
Because the Liberal Pork is bad for children, we are waging a war on OBESITY dont give them PORK!~!
16 :
Bush avoided a step toward national healthcare and continuous overspending. Money would have been given to children who aren’t even poor. Which then would lead people with private insurance to drop it for this. As a Republican I don’t like Bush but he did the right thing here. Spending is excessive and not being controlled. Which is a serious problem. This would of only of contributed to the problem and given children who aren’t poor money. Maroon liberals would only say, “because he raether spend money getting american soldiers killed than helpin kids”
17 :
He vetoed again and INCREASE, because Liberal democrats tcked on PORK




Read more discussions :

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

How can a child with autism be helped to improve his health

How can a child with autism be helped to improve his health?

Mental Health - 4 Answers
 


Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Research actress Jenny McCarthy as she has a son with autism that she helped by eliminating dairy and wheat from his diet as well as a few other things.
2 :
When you say health I am assuming you mean like normal sickness(colds,viruses). I too have a child with autism and can't figure it out. My thoughts about it are that these children don't eat the right amount of vitamins and minerals they need so that may be the cause. Its hard to answer this question without know exactly what you mean by his health. If you mean something different please let me know and I will try and answer that also.
3 :
If you mean curing his autism you can try the omega 3 therapy. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16920077
4 :
Go to http://www.generationrescue.org This is an amazing website that will totally help you. I have a little one with autism. I write a blog about it: http://autismmomjourney.blogspot.com




Read more discussions :

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Is it worth the health risks to wait until my mid 30s to have a child

Is it worth the health risks to wait until my mid 30s to have a child?
I'm not financially ready now, and my partner and I don't know if we're 100% sure about having children. I may change my mind in 5 years and be ready for it then, but then I'll be in my 30s. I stay healthy and don't smoke. I'm not ready now, but time is running out.
Trying to Conceive - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
No, if you might want kids, have them now. You'll never be completely financially ready - no one ever is - and even if you were, economies can still crash, accidents can still happen, and your perfectly planned world could still be in ruins in moments. There is no "perfect" time to have a child. However, your fertility does run out. You can't just have kids whenever you feel like it. Fertility is at its highest in the late teens and early to mid twenties. After that, your level of fertility begins to steadily decline. So if you want kids, do it now while there's more of a chance you'll actually be able to get pregnant.
2 :
Noone can make this decision for you. Only you and your partner can. But personally i wouldnt want to risk the health problems when i was 30+. I have recently had a miscarriage and they are more common later in life. I wouldnt wish it on mother. It was the most upsetting horrible thing i have ever been through. Let me just explain that your never ready to have a baby, you never have enough money or love. But in 5 years you could really want a child and then have problems having one. Maybe you should write down reasons to have a baby and reasons not to and then decide from that. But if its leaning towards having a baby then i wouldnt wait too much longer. Take a chance and see what happens Good luck
3 :
Many women have healthy babies in their 30's www.womensvirtualhealth.com (Virtual Office)
4 :
In all honesty, there's no guarantee that you are both fertile and able to conceive even now, and there is always the possibility of risk and complications in pregnancy; not to mention the fact that medical science is growing by leaps and bounds. Though i know you will love your child no matter what circumstances bring it into this world (there is, after all, always the "oops" factor), my advice is to wait until you and your partner are ready mentally and emotionally. Like someone else said, there will never be a "perfect" time, but when and if you and your partner start to feel that a child or children will complete your family, then you should start trying.
5 :
How old are you? Early thirties, certainly. If we are talking late 30s (over 34) you really should make a decision one way or another before then. Remember "Financially ready" is relative. Chances are if you have a computer you are way richer then the majority of parents in the world. The question often is really one of which is more important to you, a comfortable middle class existence or kids? If nether of you is sure, wait.
6 :
Human are the most infertile creatures. You may want children later only to discover that you have fertility problems and then, it could take you several more years to conceive if you conceive at all. I assume you are in your 20s when you are so fertile; I wish I had children then. I am now 31 and absolutely just dying to have kids. I wished I had them when I was your age, now, I get disappointed every time my P comes. Finances should not always be the determining factor when it comes to having kids. God is the giver of children and He will not leave them without provisions. Money isn't everything. All the best.





Read more discussions :